Lightroom CC now supports ‘versions’ but these are really just saved history snapshots and not the same thing at all. They seem to me one of the principal advantages of non-destructive editing tools like Lightroom – the ability to create multiple ‘versions’ of the same image with different processing treatments alongside each other. Others may disagree, but I can’t do without Virtual Copies. Both Lightroom CC and Lightroom Classic offer an impressive set of non-destructive editing tools, and Lightroom CC does almost as much as the desktop version.īut it doesn’t offer Virtual Copies. So let’s switch tack to everyday editing. (Image credit: Rod Lawton/Digital Camera World) 4.
![adobe lightroom 6 price adobe lightroom 6 price](https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/archive/staff.media/lightroom-screen.jpg)
![adobe lightroom 6 price adobe lightroom 6 price](https://rukminim1.flixcart.com/image/416/416/k0jvy4w0/book/6/0/0/adobe-lightroom-cc-6-original-imafkb646kjejyhp.jpeg)
One image, four different versions (or as many as you like) side by side. **Actually, I've just noticed that Lightroom CC will "Store a copy of all originals at the specified location" if you check that box in the Preferences, so I have to take some of that back – but I assume all my 'edits' (adjustments) are still in the cloud.** But it doesn’t – so I think I’d rather keep my images on my desktop computer where I can organise and back them up myself, and very often load them a lot more quickly. If Lightroom CC offered desktop storage but ‘mirrored’ my library to its cloud servers, that would be fine. Of course, I can always keep my originals on my own computer, but then I’m maintaining two image libraries in two places and it’s all getting messy. But the bigger my image library gets, the more I stand to lose if something DOES happen – and the more its going to cost me in Adobe cloud storage later when 1TB is no longer enough. I trust Adobe with my images, I trust it to keep backups, I trust it to have zero or near-zero downtime. You can increase your local cache so that more are stored on your own computer, but that’s a workaround, not an alternative storage location. Lightroom CC takes over your storage so that all your images are in the cloud and not on your computer. Where my pictures are stored is an issue for me.
Adobe lightroom 6 price license#
The CC version obviously operates differently from a revenue recognition perspective, which allows new features to be added without the same constraints as the perpetual license version.īottom line is that LR6 perpetual is no different to all the other LR previous versions in the way that updates are delivered, it's the CC model that's different.Call me old-fashioned, but I prefer my images here and not on a server somewhere in another part of the world.
![adobe lightroom 6 price adobe lightroom 6 price](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51lRjkCvwkL._AC_SX466_.jpg)
Unfortunately, the release of 6.1 fell outside the accounting period of the 6.0 launch, hence no new features for the perpetual license version. At the risk of being scolded by John Beardy again, I'll just say that Adobe cannot/will not/have always chosen not to include new features in any dot release unless the dot release falls within the same financial accounting period as the initial launch of the version (so for example only 4.1 and 5.2 got new features in the version 4 and 5 cycles). The reason for that is nothing to with any attempt to "drive users to the subscription model", as many conspiracy theorists like to maintain, but has got everything to do with the way that Adobe's revenue recognition procedures are set up. LR6 perpetual will follow exactly the same path as all previous LR versions, the only difference being that it didn't get any new features in the first dot release. possibly some features updates in the first "dot release" of the cycle, but all subsequent "dot releases' were the bug-fix/new camera support type. And that pattern is exactly the same as in all previous LR versions, i.e. We did get some small feature updates in 5.2, but all updates after that were simply bug-fixes and new camera/lens support. For a start, there was no 5.1.in order to align the numbering systems of ACR and LR, we skipped 5.1 and went directly to 5.2 from 5.0. This is not accurate.we did not get "free feature updates" in LR5 with updates 5.1 to 5.7.